Subject	2nd, as a chemist, the op should have a clear understanding
Posted by	TriniTT on September 12, 2012 at 9:24 AM
	This message has been viewed 222 times.
In Reply To	A shame indeed. Who needs an ozone layer. (n/m) posted by Summeronthechain (MN) on September 12, 2012 at 09:12 AM
Message	of precisely why an ozone-depleting chemical was exchanged for a less dangerous one. Cheers, JBrobst "A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful than a life spent doing nothing." George Bernard Shaw
Follow Ups	Cooling efficiency in coverted a/c systems - JMartz 08:31:53 09/12/12 Heh, nice to see my pic gettin around. :) (n/m) - SkiFly01 08:48:01 09/12/12 A shame indeed. Who needs an ozone layer. (n/m) - Summeronthechain (MN) 09:12:59 09/12/12 2nd, as a chemist, the op should have a clear understanding - TriniTT 09:24:32 09/12/12 I've heard that r134A is on the way out - Shiers69 10:10:38 09/12/12 Correct, its called HFO-1234yf - RobZ32 10:22:58 09/12/12 Had to click link to believe you - BlackholeZ 11:03:26 09/12/12 I wonder what its physical properties are. (n/m) - JMartz 19:34:28 09/13/12 Just another challenge to the automotive engineers - Barry(TN) 10:31:47 09/12/12 Trini, beware of what the government tells you. - JMartz 19:38:38 09/13/12 Profile says artist (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 10:19:58 09/12/12 New carrer after cancer. (n/m) - JMartz 19:33:28 09/13/12 10 years ago, my R12 system was optimum and after converting - zQuikonE 12:47:04 09/12/12 Thanks for your honesty. (n/m) - JMartz 19:39:46 09/13/12 Re: Cooling efficiency in coverted a/c systems - KA8 13:18:36 09/12/12 Don't you'll hate it. - JMartz 19:43:11 09/13/12 How long before HFO-1234yf? - NytWolf 15:40:06 09/12/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.